USA v. Singleton, No. 23-30475 (5th Cir. 2024)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 23-30475 Document: 60-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/19/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ No. 23-30475 Summary Calendar ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 19, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Michael Craig Singleton, Jr., Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:22-CR-264-1 ______________________________ Before King, Haynes, and Graves, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Michael Craig Singleton, Jr., pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute cocaine and was sentenced to 60 months in prison. On appeal, he argues that the district court erred in determining that he was not eligible to be sentenced pursuant to U.S.S.G § 5C1.2 because he possessed a firearm in connection with the offense. We review the district court’s findings of fact _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 23-30475 Document: 60-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/19/2024 pertaining to sentencing under § 5C1.2 for clear error and consider its legal interpretation of § 5C1.2 de novo. See United States v. Vasquez, 161 F.3d 909, 910 (5th Cir. 1998). Singleton concedes that he possessed a firearm in the center console of the vehicle that he was driving and of which he was the only occupant but argues that this possession was not related to the cocaine that was in a spare tire on the undercarriage of the vehicle. He asserts that the firearm was left accidentally in the vehicle by his brother, he placed the firearm in the center console for his brother to retrieve, and the firearm played no role in his drug trafficking activities. The record supports that there was the necessary temporal and spatial relationship between the firearm, the offense, and Singleton. See id. at 912; United States v. Guidry, 960 F.3d 676, 683 & n.7 (5th Cir. 2020). Further, Singleton did not show that it is clearly improbable that the firearm, which was loaded and readily accessible to him in a car transporting cocaine, was connected to the drug offense. See Guidry, 960 F.3d at 683; Vasquez, 161 F.3d at 912. Thus, the district court did not clearly err in refusing to apply § 5C1.2. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
