Merceda Gooding v. Sykes Enterprise, Incorporated, No. 23-1292 (4th Cir. 2024)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-1292 MERCEDA D. GOODING, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SYKES ENTERPRISE, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:20-cv-03292-PX) Submitted: February 22, 2024 Decided: February 26, 2024 Before NIEMEYER and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Merceda D. Gooding, Appellant Pro Se. Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Anessa Abrams, FORDHARRISON LLP, Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Merceda D. Gooding appeals the district court’s judgment denying relief on her discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Gooding v. Sykes Enter., Inc., No. 8:20-cv-03292-PX (D. Md. Feb. 15, 2023). We deny Gooding’s motion for a transcript at government expense and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.