Juan Lozano-Bolanos v. Eric Holder, Jr., No. 14-1311 (4th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1311 JUAN REYES LOZANO-BOLANOS, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: November 20, 2014 Decided: December 19, 2014 Before KING, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eileen P. Blessinger, Heather M. Cleary, BLESSINGER LEGAL, PLLC Falls Church, Virginia, for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney General, Terri J. Scadron, Assistant Director, Meadow W. Platt, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Juan Reyes Lozano-Bolanos, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions Immigration Appeals for review (Board) of an order dismissing of his the Board of of the appeal Immigration Judge’s decision finding that he was convicted of a particularly serious crime withholding of removal. * including the and pretermitting his request for We have thoroughly reviewed the record, relevant exhibits and the transcript of Lozano-Bolanos’ merits hearing, and conclude that the Board did not abuse convicted ineligible its discretion of a for in finding particularly withholding § 1231(b)(3)(B)(ii) (2012). serious of that Lozano-Bolanos crime removal. and thus See 8 was was U.S.C. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Lozano-Bolanos (B.I.A. Mar. 26, 2014). See In re: We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED * On appeal, Lozano-Bolanos does not challenge the denial of his applications for asylum and for protection under the Convention Against Torture. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.