US v. Harold Jackson, No. 09-7550 (4th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7550 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. HAROLD STEVEN JACKSON, a/k/a Ears, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:06-cr-00306-PJM-1) Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 30, 2009 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harold Steven Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Deborah A. Johnston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Harold order denying Steven his Jackson motion for appeals a the reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). district of court s sentence filed We have reviewed the record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (motion under § 3582(c) is subject to the discretion of the district court ); United States v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724, 727 (4th Cir. 2000). court s order States v. 2009). legal before for Jackson, the No. reasons Thus, we affirm the district stated there. 8:06-cr-00306-PJM-1 (D. See Md. United Aug. 10, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.