United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Prince Kumar Arora, Defendant-appellant, 56 F.3d 62 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CasePrince Kumar Arora, Appellant Pro Se. Gary Patrick Jordan, Donna Carol Sanger, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, MD, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting judgment against him in a civil trial for conversion of property. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Arora, No. CA-93-1281-PJM (D. Md. Aug. 29, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
