Murray L. Steinberg, in Behalf of Himself and All Thosesimilarly Situated; Chelsea Renee Steinberg, Byher Next Friend and Natural Father,plaintiffs-appellants, v. Lee A. Harris, Jr., Defendant-appellee, 54 F.3d 774 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseMurray L. Steinberg, appellant pro se.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his civil complaint against a Virginia circuit court judge in which he asserts various constitutional violations and an invasion of privacy. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Steinberg v. Harris, No. CA-95-107-R (E.D. Va. Feb. 6, 1995).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We also deny Appellant's motion for injunctive relief
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.