Carl v. Lamb, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Union Carbide Corporation, Defendant-appellee, 14 F.3d 595 (4th Cir. 1993)

Gary Wayne Hart, Charleston, WV.

Anthony J. Majestro, Charleston, WV.

S.D.W. Va.

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his complaint alleging tortious interference with contract, libel, and slander. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.^*  Lamb v. Union Carbide Corp, No. CA-91-1049-2 (S.D.W. Va. June 11, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED