United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Danny Thiemecke, Defendant-appellant, 946 F.2d 888 (4th Cir. 1991)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Charles H. Haden, II, Chief District Judge. (CR-88-39-A)
Danny Thiemecke, appellant pro se.
Mary Stanley Feinberg, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, W.Va., for appellee.
S.D.W. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before K.K. HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Danny Thiemecke appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his Fed. R. Crim. P. 35 motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Thiemecke, No. CR-88-39-A (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 24, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
