United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Adil Sami, Defendant-appellant, 861 F.2d 266 (4th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseAdil Sami, appellant pro se.
Lester Mark Joseph (Office of the U.S. Attorney), for appellee.
Before K.K. HALL, MURNAGHAN and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Adil Sami appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Sami, CR-85-217-A and CA-88-35-AM (E.D. Va. June 1, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.1
AFFIRMED.
We have considered, in reaching our decision, Appellant's informal brief filed out of time
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
