Petroleum Helicopters, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Boeing-vertol Company, Etc., et al., Defendants,boeing-vertol Company, a Division of the Boeing Company,defendant-appellee,messerschmitt-boelkow-blohm Gmbh, Defendant-appellant, 606 F.2d 114 (5th Cir. 1979)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - 606 F.2d 114 (5th Cir. 1979) Nov. 5, 1979

Liskow & Lewis, Stephen T. Victory, Larry M. Roedel, New Orleans, La., for defendant-appellant.

Phelps, Dunbar, Marks, Claverie & Sims, Harry S. Redmon, Jr., New Orleans, La., Clark R. Nichols, Seattle, Wash., for defendant-appellee.

Lemle, Kelleher, Kohlmeyer & Matthews, James H. Brown, Jr., New Orleans, La., for other interested parties.

Before AINSWORTH, VANCE and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Affirmed on the basis of the opinion of District Judge Fred J. Cassibry dated January 29, 1979, 478 F. Supp. 84 (E.D. La. 1979).

The appeal was proper by virtue of the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a) (1). See A & E Plastik Pak v. Monsanto Co., 9 Cir., 1968, 396 F.2d 710. See also McCreary Tire & Rubber Company v. CEAT, 3 Cir., 1974, 501 F.2d 1032; Warren Bros. Company v. Cardi Corp., 1 Cir., 1973, 471 F.2d 1304; Ephraim Freightways, Inc. v. Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc., 10 Cir., 376 F.2d 40, Cert. denied, 389 U.S. 829, 88 S. Ct. 92, 19 L. Ed. 2d 87 (1967).

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.