James G. Glover et al., Appellants, v. St. Louis-san Francisco Railway Company et al., Appellees, 386 F.2d 452 (5th Cir. 1967)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - 386 F.2d 452 (5th Cir. 1967) December 5, 1967

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama; Seybourn H. Lynne, Judge.

William M. Acker, Jr., Macon L. Weaver, Oscar W. Adams, Jr., Lynn G. Baldwin, Birmingham, Ala., H. Carl Isaacs, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., Smyer, White, Reid & Acker, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel, for appellants.

Jerome A. Cooper, William F. Gardner, Drayton T. Scott, Birmingham, Ala., Paul R. Moody, St. Louis, Mo., Richard R. Lyman, Donald W. Fisher, Toledo, Ohio, Benj. L. Erdreich, Birmingham, Ala., Mulholland, Hickey & Lyman, Toledo, Ohio, and Cooper, Mitch & Crawford, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel, for appellee Brotherhood of Railway Carmen of America.

Before RIVES, GOLDBERG and DYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


We agree with the opinion and decision of the district court. In addition to the authorities there cited, see Republic Steel Corporation v. Maddox, 1965, 379 U.S. 650, 85 S. Ct. 614, 13 L. Ed. 2d 580; Walker v. Southern Railway Co., 1966, 385 U.S. 196, 87 S. Ct. 365, 17 L. Ed. 2d 294; Vaca v. Sipes, 1967, 386 U.S. 171, 87 S. Ct. 903, 17 L. Ed. 2d 842; Steen v. Local Union No. 163, 6 Cir. 1967, 373 F.2d 519; Howard v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co., 8 Cir. 1966, 361 F.2d 905. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.